![]() |
Fig. 1a |
Thermal expansion of pure water does not have the same thermodynamic events that the thermal expansion of sea water has.
You can search the Internet and find videos of someone pouring pure water into a flask, making a mark on the flask, then heating the flask with a Bunsen Burner.
Then they will put another mark on the flask after the water warms, showing that the heat has caused the water to increase in volume.
They then are apt to declare that this proves that thermal expansion is
the major cause of sea level rise because "as water warms it expands."
The problem with this
Mickey Mouse trick is that
if the pure water they use is at a temperature that is below its maximum density temperature of 4 deg. C, when they apply heat to the flask the pure water will contract (lose volume)
rather than expand (gain volume), until the
pure water temperature reaches the
maximum density temperature of 4 deg C at which time it will begin to expand (as more heat is applied ... see
Fig. 1a).
![]() |
Fig. 1b |
For example, if the pure water temperature is 2 degrees C and heat is applied, the water will contract (lose volume) until its temperature increases to the maximum density temperature of 4 deg C.
Determining the
maximum density of sea water is more difficult than pure water because it contains molecules of other substances, and also is impacted by depth pressure (
Is A New Age Of Pressure Upon Us? - 14).
![]() |
Fig. 1c |
The graphs at
Fig. 1b and
Fig. 1c show a history of the sea water temperature of in
WOD Zone 5611 at 20 meters deep (Amundsen Sea area).
Following the principles enunciated in
Fig. 1a, I have marked the expansion
and contraction events to show the almost unbelievable
expanding and contracting as the sea water temperature dips below the maximum density temperature (shown by the red line).
The gist of it is that when the sea water temperature is above the red line the volume change is the opposite of what it is when the sea water temperature is below the red line.
The non-marked-up version of the
Fig. 1b graph is shown at
Fig. 1c.
Today, I used
only one zone specifically for emphasizing that
the net balance derived by adding up the thermal expansion (pluses), and subtracting the thermal contractions (minuses) does not result in either "
the major factor" or "
a major factor" of sea level rise.
The graph at
Fig. 1c, as well as the following graphs, were computed by using the
TEOS-10 function
gsw_ct_maxdensity to create the red line, and
gsw_ct_from_t to generate the black line (see
On Thermal Expansion & Thermal Contraction - 35).
Each of the following graphs (
Fig. 2a -
Fig. 2p) are generated from data of a different depth, but they are all constructed from
WOD data @
WOD Zone 5611.
See if you can determine
expansion and contraction segments of the black line as I did in
Fig. 1b. [Remember to
follow the time line flow (left to right):
Answers]
Remember that (in terms of whether
expansion or contraction will take place) when the black line is above the red line, sea water thermodynamics are the opposite from when the black line is below (cooler than) the red line (cf
On Thermal Expansion & Thermal Contraction - 35).
Finally, yes the lines are somewhat jerky because that area of the world makes it difficult to take measurements, so there are not as many measurements over the decades as we would like (especially at deepest depths).
The previous post in this series is
here.
![]() |
Fig. 2a |
![]() |
Fig. 2b |
![]() |
Fig. 2c |
![]() |
Fig. 2d |
![]() |
Fig. 2e |
![]() |
Fig. 2f |
![]() |
Fig. 2g |
![]() |
Fig. 2h |
![]() |
Fig. 2i |
![]() |
Fig. 2j |
![]() |
Fig. 2k |
![]() |
Fig. 2l |
![]() |
Fig. 2m |
![]() |
Fig. 2n |
![]() |
Fig. 2o |
![]() |
Fig. 2p |