| Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.  |
| Fig. 1 |
It does so to the degree that the planet is twenty six and a half miles bigger-around at the equator than it is at the poles (Equatorial Bulge).
It is like that because the planet is rotating (spinning) at about 1,040 mph, which pulls or pushes ocean water, among other things, toward the equator to produce a bulge (Earth's Rotation).
| Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.  |
| Fig. 2 |
Evidently it is not widely known that this rotational dynamic impacts upon sea level change.
For today's post I did some graphs based on sea level change records at or near the equator.
The graphs at Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and Fig. 4 show that significant sea level dynamics take place there.
But, like other places it is not a perfectly smooth globe there, so as graphs in Dredd Blog posts show, sea level change varies from place to place.
| Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.  |
| Fig. 3 |
The melt water entering the ocean, and the ghost-water already in the ocean at Greenland, Antarctica, and Glacier Bay for example, are pulled or pushed toward the equator, i.e., toward the bulge.
Not many people know that when melt water and ghost-water leave those areas, the sea level there falls as that water flows in the direction of the Earth's bulge as indicated in Fig. 1 (The Ghost-Water Constant, 2, 3, 4).
In other words, there is a tension between the rotational pull and ice sheet gravity pull that is rarely considered (ibid).
| Image may be NSFW. Clik here to view.  |
| Fig.4 |
The "point" where the two conflicting pulls equalize is called the "hinge point" or hinge line (The Evolution and Migration of Sea Level Hinge Points);
As the ice sheet loses mass it also axiomatically loses a directly related amount of its gravitational power.
Thus, as the Earth's rotational power becomes predominant and pulls the ghost-water away from the ice sheet area, the sea level falls around the land mass upon which the ice sheet rests (The Gravity of Sea Level Change).
It is quite clear to me that thermal expansion, land subsidence, and the like, are not major players in the sea level change scenario.
They are all minor players in sea level change.
The graphs at Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show my hypothesis as to what the origins of sea level change are (after fossil fuels are burned).
The primary factor is displacement caused by ice sheet melt and calving as the ice sheet relocates from a land mass and flows into the ocean.
Next in significance is the release of ghost-water which had been held up close to the land mass by ice-sheet gravity.
Last and least is thermal expansion, etc. which is erroneously considered to be a or the major player by many who are unaware of all of the forces at play.
It is about time for the warming science commentariat to get modern.
As soon as they realize that they have been spreading a myth or two around the globe, and stop doing so, we will all be better off for it (The Warming Science Commentariat, 2).
Their bathtub model myth is not doing anyone any good (The Bathtub Model Doesn't Hold Water).
In the next post or so of this series I intend to use major seaport zones and Antarctica zones (if those zones have tide gauge and other required data) in those zones as readers have requested.